On Thursday 21 February 2008 13:35:52 Eduardo Tongson wrote:
> If no Gentoo developer comes forward, I volunteer myself. Seems
> everybody is busy and overworked to even authorize an official team.
> Any Gentoo developer who can share their 'a day in the life of the
> Gentoo Kernel Security team' experience?
For those interested try dropping by #gentoo-security on Freenode and talk to
rbu, I think he's spoken with a few interested already.
After Fosdem this weekend I hope to catch up a bit on the kernel situation.
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (Jaervosz)
Gentoo Linux Security Team
http://security.gentoo.org
>
> -- ed*eonsec
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Peter Hjalmarsson <xake@...>
wrote:
> > AFAICS the thing missing is a leader. Someone to make a starting point
> > for the followers to make use of (not necessary inside of gentoo, I
> > believe it can always be integrated later if there are devs enough to
> > pick things up and integrate), a place for him to collect and keep list
> > and contact with interested people (also to keep "me too"-noise from
> > this list).
> >
> > This does not even have to be a integrated gentoo solution, am I right?
> > Anybody having a hosting space could host a db with the
> > information/advisories.
> > And the hosting one could let anyone he/she trusts write info to that
> > db.
> > That db could be like "This vournable exists, these are the problems,
> > these are the workarounds/patches and there are no fixed kernel
> > versions/these kernel versions are fixed" where info could be updated as
> > they get along.
> > And anybody that has the time and skill could write a applications that
> > fetch info from this db about the currently running kernel and presents
> > the user with the text "No known vournables" or "These vournables
> > exists" with links to the information in the db about that advisory.
> > This way a user can run the application, get a message, read the
> > advisories and decide "I need to update to at least this version" or "I
> > do not need to update".
> >
> > The thing needed after that is persons to keep this db up to date and
> > maybe bug devs to get fixed versions into portage.
> > But these people needs a central collection point where they could
> > "meet" and start moving things.
> >
> > And anybody can bug any dev in bugzilla if a kernel is not fixed, but
> > the chances over-worked devs will notice and be more helpful if you are
> > more helpful with what, when and why this kernel thing should be fixed
> > (i.e. come well prepared).
> >
> > tor 2008-02-21 klockan 11:16 +0800 skrev Eduardo Tongson:
> > > Alright how do we proceed to get this team started.
> > >
> > > ed*eonsec
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 13:59 -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday 17 February 2008 23:12:35 Robert Buchholz wrote:
> > > > > > On Sunday, 17. February 2008, Eduardo Tongson wrote:
> > > > > > > What specific kernel knowledge is needed to get a Kernel
> > > > > > > advisory up and running ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Between becoming aware of a vulnerability in Linux and drafting
> > > > > > an advisory for one or all kernel sources comes the part where
> > > > > > you review which versions of which kernel sources are affected
> > > > > > and unaffected. You also need to pay attention to specifics of
> > > > > > the added patchsets, which might duplicate vulnerabilities.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Parts of the job can indeed be done without Kernel and C
> > > > > > knowledge, but some cannot. So if we draft a new kernel
> > > > > > security *team*, people without C and kernel knowledge are
> > > > > > helpful -- some others need to have it, though.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Robert
> > > > >
> > > > > To be honest, 99% of what is done in the kernel security team can
> > > > > be done with no C knowledge at all.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not an expert C person - far from it - but I eventually
> > > > > became the head of Kernel Security until I retired a few months
> > > > > ago.
> > > > >
> > > > > Most of it is bug handling. The major problem is a social, not a
> > > > > technical one. Because of the manner in which our kernels are
> > > > > organized, a single vulnerability involves checking upstream
> > > > > version numbers, coordinating them into our downstream version
> > > > > numbers for all sources, checking to see if the sources are
> > > > > effected, figuring out who to CC for the bugs, then harassing
> > > > > them until they do it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Unlike other security sources, any attempt to hardmask the
> > > > > package is shutdown instantly. The chaos that would result from
> > > > > a kernel hardmask, even one of the lesser used ones, caused me to
> > > > > only successfully order one over my entire career in Gentoo
> > > > > Kernsec... even though more around 30 would have been needed. It
> > > > > is not infrequently that bugs will last six months without any
> > > > > action coming about them, and users are blissfully unaware.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am happy to give my input as the former head of Kernel
> > > > > Security, but it is my personal opinion that any advances in
> > > > > kernel security will require the full cooperation of security,
> > > > > and letting the head of kernel security be able to actually
> > > > > enforce threats, as that seems to be the only way bugs ever get
> > > > > resolved. Pleading didn't work - I tried.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Harlan Lieberman-Berg
> > > > > Gentoo Developer Emeritus
> > > >
> > > > Every word of what you said is painfully true. The only way to
> > > > accomplish this would be with an Iron Fist(fail) or a team of ~15
> > > > guys who do nothing but patch and push new kernels and the PR that
> > > > goes along with them every few days.
> > > > --
> > > > Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > gentoo-security@g.o mailing list
--
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list
|