Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-security
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-security@g.o
From: Alex Legler <a3li@g.o>
Subject: Re: No GLSA since January?!?
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 00:27:33 +0200
On Friday 26 August 2011 16:02:56 Kevin Bryan wrote:
> I was not considering the entire process, just the part that really
> impacts me: identifying vulnerable and patched packages.  Full
> advisories are nice, but really what I want to know is when I need to
> update a particular package.
> 
> You are right that marking the packages that contain fixes doesn't
> really scale because of increased baggage to carry forward.
> 
> The problem I have with GLSA's is that they don't come out until after
> the problem has been fixed.
> 
> Perhaps it would be better to just have a system to label a particular
> ebuild/version as vulnerable.  Maybe something closer to package.mask,
> but for security would be appropriate.  With a package.security_mask,
> you could have anyone on the security project update that file with
> packages as soon as they know about it and while they are waiting on the
> devs to fix it.  References/links/impact could be noted in the comments
> above, as package.mask does now.
> 
> As for interacting with 'emerge', I don't think we want the same
> semantics as package.mask, since we don't want to force a downgrade (if
> possible).  It should probably just warn when you ask it to install a
> vulnerable version.  Upgrades to safe versions will be quiet that way.
> The @security would contain packages with and without fixes so you get
> warnings for things that remain vulnerable, and updates for things that
> are fixed.
> 
> Thoughts?

I see this as an addition to sending advisories after fixing an issue, not as 
a solution to the issue at hand.

-- 
Alex Legler <a3li@g.o>
Gentoo Security / Ruby
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
Replies:
Re: No GLSA since January?!?
-- Daniel A. Avelino
References:
No GLSA since January?!?
-- Christian Kauhaus
Re: No GLSA since January?!?
-- Alex Legler
Re: No GLSA since January?!?
-- Kevin Bryan
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: No GLSA since January?!?
Next by thread:
Re: No GLSA since January?!?
Previous by date:
Re: No GLSA since January?!?
Next by date:
Re: No GLSA since January?!?


Updated May 10, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-security mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.