Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: shoehn@××××××××××××××××××××.info
To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Built in integrity?
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:58:51
Message-Id: 20040210080003.GA14737@p15138739.pureserver.info
1 On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 16:14:21 -0800
2 Joby Walker <zorloc@××××××××.org> wrote:
3
4 [..]
5
6 > They are not discussing the MD5s stored in the portage tree but the MD5s
7 > that are generated and stored in the CONTENTS files
8 > (/var/db/pkg/*/*/CONTENTS), which are the compiled binaries.
9 >
10
11 I don't consider all these checks very useful. How can I be sure the files emerge downloaded are really the
12 correct ones? I guess if someone would try fool me with the help of the portage system he would change the
13 version of portage with a "bad" one, that would obtain the "bad" files from an evil server, but with correct
14 MD5 sums. So noone would realize that unless the tampered copy of portage is detected.
15
16 I would suggest a normal IDS and try to keep the installed program's integrity in place. The portage's
17 integrity is a really hard to solve problem, as long as I cannot be sure that the portage binary does what
18 it is supposed to do.
19
20 -
21 Sebastian Höhn
22
23
24 --
25 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-security] Built in integrity? James Harlow <james@××××××××××××××.nu>
Re: [gentoo-security] Built in integrity? Ed Grimm <paranoid@××××××××××××××××××××××.org>