Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <jaervosz@g.o>
To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Days of yore
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:10:57
Message-Id: 200704161756.32761.jaervosz@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] Days of yore by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On Monday 16 April 2007 16:05, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > Not to mention in my case upstream had already acted or etc, so no
3 > patching or etc was needed on my behalf. Just bumps and stabilization if
4 > anything.
5 Yeah, this is because the Security team is simply understaffed as has been the
6 case for far too long. We only have a few very active members and due to
7 process and QA stuff it simply takes time. I hope we're going to bring it
8 down soon though.
9
10 Try searching for bugs in ebuild+ or ebuild++ status, that should give a hint
11 about what problems we face. Not to mention other + and ++ statuses.
12
13 > Kernel issues must be a nightmare for the security team.
14 Kernel issues are a nightmare because of the many sources and the way Gentoo
15 handles kernel sources. emerge gentoo-sources won't magically fix your
16 machine and besides not everyone want to upgrade their kernel for every small
17 issue. That's why plasmaroo wrote KISS, sadly he left before it went public
18 and now we waiting for another tool for kernel issues. It's not even on the
19 horizon yet (at least not to my knowledge). This started out as a small
20 problem that we thought would be temporary but has sadly turned kind of
21 permanent without us informing users properly. So if you want to help get
22 things back on track please join #gentoo-security and lets talk.
23
24 --
25 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
26 Gentoo Linux Security Team