| 1 |
I agree with this as well. Just the package name by itself at the |
| 2 |
beginning would be superb. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Btw, nice work everyone on the GLSA's. They're pouring out great! Good |
| 5 |
job! :) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Hi Kurt, |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> > [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200405-20 dev-db/mysql ] Insecure Temporary |
| 11 |
>> > File Creation In MySQL |
| 12 |
>> > |
| 13 |
>> > Maybe even the version number in there somewhere too. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> I can see benefit in adding at least the package name at the beginning, |
| 16 |
>> but |
| 17 |
>> I think trying to include the category name and version number is a bit |
| 18 |
>> too |
| 19 |
>> over-the-top. At the end of the day, it's really not that big of a deal |
| 20 |
>> to |
| 21 |
>> hit the enter key to read the rest of the email. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Yeah, as I think if I see a GLSA concerning a package that I use, I'd read |
| 24 |
> it |
| 25 |
> despite of versioning information, so I think, too, that versioning in the |
| 26 |
> title is not really needed :-). |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> take care, have fun |
| 29 |
> /christian |
| 30 |
> EDDK |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives