Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-security
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-security@g.o
From: John Manko <jmanko@...>
Subject: Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:39:37 -0400
Andrej Kacian wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:05:39 -0400
>xyon <xyon@...> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Then perhaps Gentoo isn't the distro for you.. I chose Gentoo because it
>>is sort of LFS-like, but with a fraction of the time to setup. Maybe a
>>binary-based distribution like RedHat or Debian would fit you better. ;)
>>    
>>
>
>The fraction-of-time-to-setup feature comes from the fact that portage
>(package manager) does most of the work for you - and that was exactly my
>point - emerging xorg-x11 is much less time-consuming than downloading,
>patching and compiling it manually, which is not something everyone can afford
>to invest time into.
>
>Note that I politely ignore your binary-distro argument.
>
>  
>
I have to agree with the portage point.  In fact, I think the three 
reasons Gentoo is where it's at is because of the following:

1.  They have the best documentation out of any distribution.  Just 
think about the first time you installed it.  How easy was it because of 
the documentation, and how much did you learn?

2. It's ports based.  I remember the days of rpmfind when I used 
RedHat.  That was a nightmare.  Portage is pretty much up-to-date, bug 
free (the programs being installed, that is), and easy to use if you 
take the small amount of time to learn the commands.  Again, this ties 
into the great documentation.

3. The user forums.  The forums are what I like most about Gentoo.  It's 
has the best community of users and developers of any distro.  It's easy 
find an answer, ask a question, and get a reasonable response!  Without 
it, I think that most people would have thrown up their hands in 
frustration.





-- 
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list


References:
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
-- Andrej Kacian
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
-- xyon
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
-- Andrej Kacian
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
Next by thread:
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
Previous by date:
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
Next by date:
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-security mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.