Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Miguel Filipe <miguel.filipe@×××××.com>
To: Benjamin Martin <outrage@×××.net>, gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] FYI: Suse warns of hole in Linux kernel
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:50:54
Message-Id: f058a9c3041029105029083884@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] FYI: Suse warns of hole in Linux kernel by Benjamin Martin
1 I believe that this:
2 http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2004/Oct/0223.html is related.
3 That link talks about a bug in the iptables "log" code.
4 It might be that, the remote root acording to that anouncement is on
5 S390 machines.
6
7
8
9 On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:52:30 +0200, Benjamin Martin <outrage@×××.net> wrote:
10 > The article doesn't really give a lot of information about what kind of flaw it
11 > is. It just talks about a "packet". What kind of packet? What kind of bug?
12 >
13 > With the information given it's pretty hard to judge on severity,
14 >
15 > Cheers,
16 >
17 > Ben
18 >
19 > On 21:26 Thu 28 Oct , Rui Covelo wrote:
20 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
21 > > Hash: SHA1
22 > >
23 > >
24 > >
25 > >
26 > > Found this on OSNews:
27 > > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/10/27/HNsusewarns_1.html
28 > >
29 > >
30 > > What are your thoughts on this?
31 > >
32 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
34 > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
35 > >
36 > > iD8DBQFBgVYBfLPhlaxNQk0RAtSTAJsE2Jjg2Hjsx832FQ9Qqhf/o0Dw7QCcDH6m
37 > > mYdOUQnxhal+CV4jeHb1ZWs=
38 > > =cmSV
39 > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
40
41
42 --
43 Miguel Sousa Filipe
44
45 --
46 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-security] FYI: Suse warns of hole in Linux kernel Pedro Venda <pjlv@××××××××××××.pt>