1 |
I believe that this: |
2 |
http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2004/Oct/0223.html is related. |
3 |
That link talks about a bug in the iptables "log" code. |
4 |
It might be that, the remote root acording to that anouncement is on |
5 |
S390 machines. |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:52:30 +0200, Benjamin Martin <outrage@×××.net> wrote: |
10 |
> The article doesn't really give a lot of information about what kind of flaw it |
11 |
> is. It just talks about a "packet". What kind of packet? What kind of bug? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> With the information given it's pretty hard to judge on severity, |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Cheers, |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Ben |
18 |
> |
19 |
> On 21:26 Thu 28 Oct , Rui Covelo wrote: |
20 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
21 |
> > Hash: SHA1 |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > Found this on OSNews: |
27 |
> > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/10/27/HNsusewarns_1.html |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > What are your thoughts on this? |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
33 |
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) |
34 |
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > iD8DBQFBgVYBfLPhlaxNQk0RAtSTAJsE2Jjg2Hjsx832FQ9Qqhf/o0Dw7QCcDH6m |
37 |
> > mYdOUQnxhal+CV4jeHb1ZWs= |
38 |
> > =cmSV |
39 |
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Miguel Sousa Filipe |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |