Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@×××××××.net>
To: solar@g.o
Cc: Thierry Carrez <koon@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o, gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-security] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stack smash protected daemons
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 06:35:11
Message-Id: 4153BFF0.4000005@comcast.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-security] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stack smash protected daemons by Ned Ludd
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4
5
6 Ned Ludd wrote:
7 | dammit are we over complicating this?
8 | You guys seem to be hung up on silly USE/FEATURE flag names.
9 | How about we as Ciaran McCreesh proposed just add it to CFLAGS by
10 | default and deploy stages in such a manner.
11 | Solves everything for most cases and leave the option up to the user to
12 | disable if he/she wants to.
13 |
14
15 Fine by me. Not that my opinion matters, mind you *points to the domain
16 his e-mail comes from, distinctly NOT @gentoo.org* :)
17
18 [...]
19
20 - --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
22
23 - --
24 All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
25 Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.
26
27 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
29 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
30
31 iD8DBQFBU7/rhDd4aOud5P8RAjIgAJ9LjQmc35PsUFiBntwE6981UFEh9wCfSL6N
32 2RHyBB7Pi1LM/H6Y/JXkmIs=
33 =GdJl
34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
35
36 --
37 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list