| 1 |
I agree too, just name in front of the message is sufficient |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
El Tue, 25 May 2004 19:31:40 -0500 (EST) |
| 5 |
"Joey McCoy" <ixion@××××××.com> escribió: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> I agree with this as well. Just the package name by itself at the |
| 8 |
> beginning would be superb. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Btw, nice work everyone on the GLSA's. They're pouring out great! Good |
| 11 |
> job! :) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> > Hi Kurt, |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> >> > [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200405-20 dev-db/mysql ] Insecure Temporary |
| 17 |
> >> > File Creation In MySQL |
| 18 |
> >> > |
| 19 |
> >> > Maybe even the version number in there somewhere too. |
| 20 |
> >> |
| 21 |
> >> I can see benefit in adding at least the package name at the beginning, |
| 22 |
> >> but |
| 23 |
> >> I think trying to include the category name and version number is a bit |
| 24 |
> >> too |
| 25 |
> >> over-the-top. At the end of the day, it's really not that big of a deal |
| 26 |
> >> to |
| 27 |
> >> hit the enter key to read the rest of the email. |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> > Yeah, as I think if I see a GLSA concerning a package that I use, I'd read |
| 30 |
> > it |
| 31 |
> > despite of versioning information, so I think, too, that versioning in the |
| 32 |
> > title is not really needed :-). |
| 33 |
> > |
| 34 |
> > take care, have fun |
| 35 |
> > /christian |
| 36 |
> > EDDK |
| 37 |
> > |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> -- |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> -- |
| 45 |
> gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> |
Archives