Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Joby Walker <zorloc@××××××××.org>
To: Mark Guertin <guertin@××××××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Built in integrity?
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:15:02
Message-Id: 4028225D.2040303@imperium.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] Built in integrity? by Mark Guertin
1 Mark Guertin wrote:
2
3 > On 9-Feb-04, at 6:12 PM, J Holder wrote:
4 >
5 >>> could these md5's be used? maybe have portage make the files immutable,
6 >>
7 >> and find some way to protect them from anyone but root, since if they've
8 >> got root i doubt they would be going to all the trouble of doing that,
9 >> unless they want to use your box as a hole for something else, maybe a
10 >> way to keep those hashes on some type of removable media? usb flash
11 >> devices and such anyone? maybe a floppy for just the binutils and such?
12 >
13 >
14 > Tracking the MD5 sums that are stored wouldn't be very useful here.
15 > They are for the source files only (and not the actual binaries that
16 > would be replaced in the event of rooting).
17 >
18
19 Mark,
20
21 They are not discussing the MD5s stored in the portage tree but the MD5s
22 that are generated and stored in the CONTENTS files
23 (/var/db/pkg/*/*/CONTENTS), which are the compiled binaries.
24
25 jbw
26
27
28 --
29 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-security] Built in integrity? Christian Schwede <cschwede@×××××××××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-security] Built in integrity? Mark Guertin <guertin@××××××××××××××.com>