| 1 |
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:16:51 +0000 |
| 2 |
"Keith Edmunds" <keith@×××××××××××.com> Add to Address Book wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:16:24 +0100 |
| 5 |
> Frank Gruellich <frank@××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > That's exactly why I seem to sound unfriendly: this is a technical |
| 8 |
> > list, and I prefere a very clear diction for technical facts. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That's what we all want too. Calling people "stupid" is not a technical |
| 11 |
> fact. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I too would like that, but i think there is at lease one case where calling someone stupid might be considered a technical fact... SCO. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK---- |
| 16 |
Version: 3.1 |
| 17 |
GCS/CM/E/M/S/O d--(-) s:+>:- |
| 18 |
a--->-->->>+>++>+++$ C+++>++++$ UL++++>++++$ |
| 19 |
P+++>++++$ L++++>++++$ !E-? W++>++$>+++$ |
| 20 |
N++>* !o? !K? w--->---$ O-- M-@ !V--? PS+++(++(+((-)))) |
| 21 |
PE Y+(++)@ PGP+++(++) t+++>+++$ 5--(-)@ X++@>+++@ |
| 22 |
R+(++)@ tv+++@>++@ b+>++ DI++++ D+++@ G+++>++++ |
| 23 |
e>+$>++$>+++$>++++$>+++++$ h+>++ r*(--(++))@ !y+>-->->+++@ |
| 24 |
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK----- |
Archives