Re: [gentoo-security] GLSAs: Put the name of the affected packg in front of the title?!

[Jean-François Maeyhieux]

I'm agree too since i use the RDF format in evolution mail client on my
start page:

     I think the name should take in consideration the name of the
package and until wich version the security alert 
is valid as:

GLSA 200405-24 (high) media-video/mplayer (<0.92.4)

                    TuTTle


> I agree too, just name in front of the message is sufficient
>
>
> El Tue, 25 May 2004 19:31:40 -0500 (EST)
> "Joey McCoy" <ixion@××××××.com> escribió:
>
> > I agree with this as well. Just the package name by itself at the
> > beginning would be superb.
> >
> > Btw, nice work everyone on the GLSA's. They're pouring out great! Good
> > job! :)
> >
> >
> > > Hi Kurt,
> > >
> > >> > [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200405-20 dev-db/mysql ] Insecure Temporary
> > >> > File Creation In MySQL
> > >> >
> > >> > Maybe even the version number in there somewhere too.
> > >>
> > >> I can see benefit in adding at least the package name at the beginning,
> > >> but
> > >> I think trying to include the category name and version number is a bit
> > >> too
> > >> over-the-top.  At the end of the day, it's really not that big of a deal
> > >> to
> > >> hit the enter key to read the rest of the email.
> > >
> > > Yeah, as I think if I see a GLSA concerning a package that I use, I'd read
> > > it
> > > despite of versioning information, so I think, too, that versioning in the
> > > title is not really needed :-).
> > >
> > > take care, have fun
> > > /christian
> > > EDDK
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-security@g.o mailing list
> >
> >