Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/27 Volker Armin Hemmann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:volkerarmin@...">volkerarmin@...</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
On Wednesday 27 October 2010, Kirktis wrote:<br>
> and people wonder why gentoo is not taken seriously by the enterprise.<br>
><br>
> On 10/27/10, <a href="mailto:dev-random@...">dev-random@...</a> <<a href="mailto:dev-random@...">dev-random@...</a>> wrote:<br>
> > #342619 [<a href="http://bugs.gentoo.org/342619" target="_blank">http://bugs.gentoo.org/342619</a>]<br>
> > RESOLVED WONTFIX<br>
> ><br>
> > Are you intentionally leaving security hole in system?<br>
<br>
please show me some enterprise distros incorporating that patch.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>This is not usable issue of one or another patch. This is something un-serious to the companies. Should we upgrade our servers or not? I'ts like ticking bomb! Upgrading... Block! Removing, upgrading... Compilation fail because of some strange thing happen - maybe sun eruption or something else. Now collection is expanded to patches that will not be mainstreamed :> This is GOOD PRACTICE :). Thinking about Debian on servers - tell me why? - after 4 years with Gentoo :><br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Mateusz Mierzwiński<br><br>Bluebox Software [PL]<br>Neural Networks, Artificial Perception and Artificial Intelligence projects coordinator<br>
|
|
