Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Justin Mazzi <jmazzi@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo-security <gentoo-security@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Re:
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:36:35
Message-Id: 5df9691c04072213364b2d6f42@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] Re: by Robert Sanders
1 I haven't seen this email either. I'm guessing gmail caught it.
2
3 On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:21:49 -0400, Robert Sanders
4 <rob-lists@××××××××.com> wrote:
5 > On Thursday 22 July 2004 02:24 pm, Gary Nichols wrote:
6 > > I certainly got a good chuckle out of it. Any chance we can run de-MIME
7 > > or something similar to filter this stuff out in the future? Not that we
8 > > all don't already have .procmailrc files that scrape this stuff out
9 > > anyway... *nudge* *wink*
10 >
11 >
12 > This thing doesn't even get close to passing my filters. All we need is a
13 > MailScanner/clam AV/Spamassassin or equivalent firewall. I'm surprized the
14 > geekyone's in charge haven't done so ;)
15 >
16 > If I didn't need to see abuse and spam complaints at this domain this would
17 > have been blackholed.
18 >
19 > I would offer to help, but I bet the volume of mail gentoo does would put a
20 > hurtin on my little cluster lol.
21 >
22 > Rob
23 >
24 > {Attachment Removed} {Spam} [gentoo-security] Re:
25 > <html><p><b><font size="+1" color="red">{Warning} </FONT>This message has had
26 > one
27 > or more attachments removed<BR>
28 > <p><b><font size="+1" color="red">{Warning} </FONT>(Dog.com) <BR>
29 > <p><b><font size="+1" color="red">{Warning} </FONT>Please read the
30 > "r256-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information.</b><br
31 > /></p>
32 > <body>
33 > >fotoinfo<br><br>
34 >
35 > <br>
36 > </body></html>
37 > r256-Attachment-Warning.txt
38 >
39 >
40 >
41 > --
42 > gentoo-security@g.o mailing list
43 >
44 > --
45 > gentoo-security@g.o mailing list
46 >
47 >
48
49
50 --
51 Justin Mazzi
52
53 --
54 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Robert Sanders <rob-lists@××××××××.com>