1 |
Placing demands on the devs who donate their time for this community is |
2 |
not exactly the way of going about it. Finding a way to help those devs |
3 |
is a better path to a solution. ;) |
4 |
|
5 |
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 07:28 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: |
6 |
> I'm using the workaround of manually deleting the problem patch during |
7 |
> the build. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> The problem for gentoo that I see is that with the removal of -r1 (and |
10 |
> xfree being the only viable alternative is not available either), gentoo |
11 |
> does not have a usable desktop for those actually using it in |
12 |
> production, so this should be viewed as a serious issue that requires |
13 |
> active resolution - just leaving this issue in place until we catch up |
14 |
> with upstream means this is going to become a running sore for gentoo. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> We (the users) need a stable, secure, and working X. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> BillK |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:03 -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
23 |
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:59:21AM +0800, W.Kenworthy wrote: |
24 |
> > > Re the xorg-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? The -r2 |
25 |
> > > version is unusable for me because of this. |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> > > According to the bug its resolved, fixed upstream, but there is no |
28 |
> > > detail which versions of xorg it applies to. |
29 |
> > > |
30 |
> > > BillK |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > Hi Bill, |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > -r3 is just a simple security bump from -r2, so it should have all the |
35 |
> > characteristics of -r2 except for that buffer overflow issue with pixmap |
36 |
> > memory requests. So yeah, you'll still see black icons, but please do |
37 |
> > track the upstream bug: |
38 |
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3781 |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > Thanks, |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > Seemant |
43 |
> -- |
44 |
> William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> |
45 |
> Home! |
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |