| 1 |
On Friday 29 October 2004 23:26, Pedro Venda wrote: |
| 2 |
> hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> if it is a specific bug for suse linux distro and to S390 platform, i |
| 5 |
> suppose it doesn't qualify as a "kernel bug"... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> won't you agree? |
| 8 |
It's not SUSE specific see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68375 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> [] |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Miguel Filipe wrote: |
| 14 |
> > I believe that this: |
| 15 |
> > http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2004/Oct/0223.html is related. |
| 16 |
> > That link talks about a bug in the iptables "log" code. |
| 17 |
> > It might be that, the remote root acording to that anouncement is on |
| 18 |
> > S390 machines. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:52:30 +0200, Benjamin Martin <outrage@×××.net> |
| 21 |
wrote: |
| 22 |
> >>The article doesn't really give a lot of information about what kind of |
| 23 |
> >> flaw it is. It just talks about a "packet". What kind of packet? What |
| 24 |
> >> kind of bug? |
| 25 |
> >> |
| 26 |
> >>With the information given it's pretty hard to judge on severity, |
| 27 |
> >> |
| 28 |
> >>Cheers, |
| 29 |
> >> |
| 30 |
> >>Ben |
| 31 |
> >> |
| 32 |
> >>On 21:26 Thu 28 Oct , Rui Covelo wrote: |
| 33 |
> > |
| 34 |
> > Found this on OSNews: |
| 35 |
> > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/10/27/HNsusewarns_1.html |
| 36 |
> > |
| 37 |
> > |
| 38 |
> > What are your thoughts on this? |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> -- |
| 41 |
> gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (Jaervosz) |
| 45 |
Operational Manager |
| 46 |
Gentoo Linux Security Team |
Archives