Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-security
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-security@g.o
From: Alec Warner <warnera6@...>
Subject: Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:41:54 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

W.Kenworthy wrote:
> I do do that at times, but in this case the quickest was to start the
> emerge (glsa-check -f package) then CTRL-Z it after the unpack, but
> before the patch stage (easy because there are so many patches), delete
> patch 9914*, foreground (fg) the job and it works.
> 
> My reason for starting this thread was not to flame, but try and add
> weight to others who have added to the original, long standing bug about
> this to get this patch formally deleted from the stable branch as its
> manifestly not needed for the majority of users.  The very small group
> who do need this patch are using gcc4 which is hardly mainstream.  Even
> though the comment was this patch was applied upstream, its actually
> physically applied by the ebuild, so why cant the ebuild just not apply
> it?

Like I said previously, this is not the correct place to discuss the
semantics of the ebuild.  Talk to the xorg maintainer.

<antarus> !meta xorg-x11
<jeeves> antarus: Package: x11-base/xorg-x11  Herd: x11 Maintainer: x11
Description: X11 implementation by X.Org Foundation
<antarus> !herd x11
<jeeves> antarus: (x11) azarah, battousai, eradicator, hhg, lu_zero,
seemant, sekretarz, spyderous

You probably want to get a hold of spyderous, or seemant as I see he
commented earlier on this issue on-list.  Regardless, this list is not
the correct place to have this discussion.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=RfaP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list


References:
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
-- xyon
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
-- W.Kenworthy
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
-- Barry . SCHWARTZ
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
-- W.Kenworthy
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
Next by thread:
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
Previous by date:
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
Next by date:
Re: org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-security mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.