1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Jeremy Huddleston wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> This has been a recurring theme with kernel vulnerabilities, and it |
7 |
> needs to be addressed. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Why don't we have tiered support for the kernel sources in the same way |
10 |
> we do for arcs... ie: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Tier-1: |
13 |
> vanilla-sources |
14 |
> development-sources |
15 |
> gentoo-sources |
16 |
> gentoo-dev-sources |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Tier-2: |
19 |
> hardened-sources |
20 |
> selinux-sources |
21 |
> grsec-sources |
22 |
> <tier1 arch>-sources |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Tier-3: |
25 |
> ck, wolk, mm, etc |
26 |
> <other arch>-sources |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Then when all of Tier-1 has been patched, we can release a GLSA for the |
29 |
> Tier-1 kernels. Similar for Tier-2 and Tier-3. This way, most of our |
30 |
> users don't have to wait for hppa-dev-sources to be patched before |
31 |
> getting the GLSA. |
32 |
|
33 |
I definitely agree. That's what the blurb about "Temporary GLSA" is |
34 |
about in the Vulnerability Treatment Policy : |
35 |
|
36 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~koon/docs/vulnerability-policy.html#doc_chap4 |
37 |
|
38 |
If we can define this tiers and everyone agree on them, that's fine. |
39 |
|
40 |
IMHO we need at least one GRSEC-hardened kernel in tier 1, so that the |
41 |
security-conscious has something "tier-1 supported & security-enhanced" |
42 |
to put on its servers. I would vote for grsec-sources, as it is just |
43 |
vanilla+grsec patch, so it's not too hard to maintain ? |
44 |
|
45 |
- - Koon |
46 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
47 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
48 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
49 |
|
50 |
iD8DBQFA2ohavcL1obalX08RAgYCAJ0dK4RFTrJvjfePkZzAt4WjK9dGPgCfXdeg |
51 |
5YahNfUznHropA4Xo3WTDUs= |
52 |
=qEXF |
53 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |