Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Giles Coochey <giles.coochey@××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-security] firewall suggestions?
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:14:01
Message-Id: 4926A5BE4AFE7C4A83D5CF5CDA7B77543B8BB1@oxcore01.mirada-solutions.com
1 You should note that most attackers will only scan ports for which they
2 have exploits for, few will run scanners in the way that system
3 administrators do to test their own systems. They usually not all that
4 concerned about which systems they compromise, but rather how many
5 systems they compromise.
6
7 > -----Original Message-----
8 > From: Oliver Schad [mailto:o.schad@×××.de]
9 > Sent: 08 January 2004 16:32
10 > To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
11 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] firewall suggestions?
12 >
13 >
14 > Am Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2004 17:06 schrieb mir Ryan Voots:
15 > > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:17:49 +0100
16 > >
17 > > "Oliver Schad" <o.schad@×××.de> Add to Address Book wrote:
18 > > > Probably you think ICMP is dangerous too. There are a lot of brain
19 > > > dead admins who blocks ICMP packets and they wonder why
20 > connections
21 > > > to some websites are broken or if they administrate the
22 > packet filter
23 > > > before a webserver they wonder why some user grouches
24 > they wouldn't
25 > > > get a connection to the web server.
26 > >
27 > > thats one reason i don't block it, some services and things
28 > use it to
29 > > look for hosts that are up, what i wish i could do is some type of
30 > > limit where it would only send replies to them at a certain
31 > rate, just
32 > > so that a ping -f on 12 machines to my machine wouldn't cause a huge
33 > > bandwidth surge from my machine.
34 >
35 > A limit is a good way to protect from DDOS.
36 >
37 > mfg
38 > Oli
39 >
40 > --
41 > gentoo-security@g.o mailing list
42 >
43 >
44
45 --
46 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list