| 1 |
On Monday 23 August 2004 16:27, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Are there any plans to bring all this into the 2.6 kernels, or is the |
| 3 |
> > move towards SELinux? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Try hardened-dev-sources - they contain GRSecurity and PaX, and are |
| 6 |
> well-maintained. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Thanks for that - not sure why I didn't notice that. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
But as a general feeling, do people feel that SELinux will become the |
| 11 |
hardening method of choice? I.e. If I have to make a choice and commit now, |
| 12 |
shall I stick with GRSec, or start looking at SE? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
C |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Random russian saying: For ill do well, Then fear not hell. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
jabber: jcalum@××××××××××××.uk |
| 22 |
pgp: http://gk.umtstrial.co.uk/~calum/keys.php |
| 23 |
Linux 2.6.5-gentoo 16:30:33 up 1 day, 4:07, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.14, |
| 24 |
0.12 |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives