[gentoo-security] No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?)

[Peter Simons]

Kurt Lieber writes:

 > I would recommend that you, along with the other folks
 > who have misunderstood what this thread is about go back
 > and re-read the original post. [...] The original poster
 > was talking about the inability to verify *eclasses*, not
 > ebuilds.

Okay. This is the point where I realize that I was wasting
my time.

There is a certain irony to the fact that you (and others)
go on and on lecturing me (and others), all the while it is
perfectly obvious that you have absolutely no idea what this
problem really *means*.

So if you guys would like to be the laughing stock of the
free software community once this vulnerability is exploited
for the first time, all I say is: Be my guest.

I am out of this thread.

Peter


--
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list