1 |
I tend to put heavily used slices toward the center. For db servers, I |
2 |
usually do something like. |
3 |
|
4 |
root |
5 |
usr |
6 |
tmp |
7 |
swap |
8 |
var |
9 |
opt |
10 |
export |
11 |
|
12 |
Mainly this is to get tmp and swap in the middle and between usr and var, |
13 |
where I expect the disk head to be most of the time. It makes the average |
14 |
seek more likely to be less than have the max. I have not tested any of |
15 |
this, just do it because it seems logical. |
16 |
|
17 |
Your situation may call for a different layout, especially if you're |
18 |
accessing large media files within home. You'll want to put that stuff near |
19 |
the center, maybe |
20 |
|
21 |
root |
22 |
usr |
23 |
tmp |
24 |
swap |
25 |
home |
26 |
var |
27 |
|
28 |
or something like that. You'll probably want to look into bandwidth as a |
29 |
bottleneck too. Check out your low-bandwidth X options and/or VNC and/or |
30 |
gigabit NICs, etc... |
31 |
|
32 |
Good luck, |
33 |
Anthony |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-----Original Message----- |
37 |
From: Rodrigo Garcia [mailto:rodrigog@××××××××××××.mx] |
38 |
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:10 PM |
39 |
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o |
40 |
Subject: [gentoo-server] partition layout on desktop app server |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
Hello fellow gentoo-server users! |
44 |
|
45 |
I'm planning an install of an application server, that is, a GUI |
46 |
application server via X11, as in Terminal Server. It will run desktop |
47 |
apps like OpenOffice, gnome, mozilla, gaim, lyx, evolution... I think |
48 |
the main performance bottleneck will be the hard-drives which, I |
49 |
believe, are the slowest devices on any system. |
50 |
What would you recomend for the layout of the different partitions? |
51 |
Are access times different on different parts of the drive? I recall |
52 |
reading that access times are faster at the beginning of the drive, but |
53 |
I also sort of remember that access times are optimum in the middle of |
54 |
the drive, as it's that zone where the heads are most likely to be in |
55 |
any given moment. In your experience: what parts of the filesystem are |
56 |
accessed more often? /usr? /home, perhaps? maybe /tmp? Is there a way to |
57 |
measure this? |
58 |
|
59 |
Would there be performance benefits from placing this parts of the |
60 |
filesystem in a different order in the partition layout? |
61 |
|
62 |
And what filesystems do you recomend for the different partitions in |
63 |
a desktop-app-server scenario? |
64 |
|
65 |
Any comments are welcome! |
66 |
|
67 |
Thanks |
68 |
|
69 |
Rodrigo |
70 |
|
71 |
IMPORTANT WARNING: |
72 |
This e-mail is intended for the use of the person to whom it is addressed |
73 |
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential, the |
74 |
disclosure of which is governed by applicable law. Dissemination, |
75 |
distribution or copying of this information in an unauthorized manner is |
76 |
strictly prohibited. Sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by |
77 |
any virus transmitted by this e-mail. If you receive this in error, please |
78 |
notify the sender. |