| 1 |
Jan Meier wrote: |
| 2 |
> I would be willing to start such a stable tree, I am thinking of taking a |
| 3 |
> current portage tree, delete all ~arch ebuilds and create an overlay. Every |
| 4 |
> time a security announcement is fired up I will add the newer ebuild to the |
| 5 |
> overlay, checking for any really needed depencies. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
~arch doesn't hurt, so the main difference to glsa-check+standard tree |
| 8 |
would be old ebuilds not being deleted right? AFAIK that can be done by |
| 9 |
removing the --delete and --delete-after flag from PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS in |
| 10 |
/etc/make.conf (dunno if thats "supported" though). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
cheers |
| 13 |
Paul |
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives