Archives
Archives
| From: | Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-server] QA or an unchanging portage tree? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 03 Feb 2004 21:20:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040203211954.GC32533@mail.lieber.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-server] QA or an unchanging portage tree? by Joe Sleeper |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:10:48PM -0500 or thereabouts, Joe Sleeper wrote: |
| 2 | > In my opinion both options, if executed in a manner that makes sense, |
| 3 | > would help make Gentoo a better option for more people to use it in a |
| 4 | > server environment. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | OK, let me clarify the original question. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Of course both options are important. However, if you had to pick which |
| 9 | one would be implemented *first*, which would you choose and why? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | --kurt |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-server] QA or an unchanging portage tree? | Joe Sleeper <joe@××××××××.org> |