Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Re: gs-sources - gone!?
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 03:35:22
Message-Id: 1097811408.8141.5.camel@pursuit
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] Re: gs-sources - gone!? by "Sancho2k.net Lists"
1 On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 17:02, Sancho2k.net Lists wrote:
2 > Daniel Drake said:
3 >
4 > > You are free to continue using gs-sources if you want to. You would be in
5 > > exactly the same situation if the ebuild was still in the tree - it is not
6 > > under development either way.
7 > >
8 > > Also, I would not recommend running -pre or -rc kernels in a server
9 > > environment.
10 >
11 > Agreed.
12 >
13 > One question - since 2.6 has gone to the "official" stable kernel at
14 > kernel.org, how long can users of hardened-sources count on it being a
15 > stable, maintained offering from the hardened team? (Before it would be
16 > advisable to move to a 2.6 series kernel?)
17
18 You should look at hardened-dev-sources if you want to see the upcoming
19 hardened 2.6 kernel. It seems fairly stable for me, although I haven't
20 run it on many boxes. It worth at least testing!
21
22 --
23 Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
24 Gentoo Infrastructure
25
26 ---
27 GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
28 Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
29
30 ramereth/irc.freenode.net

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] Re: gs-sources - gone!? Michael Schachtebeck <michael.schachtebeck@×××××××××××××××××××.de>