| 1 |
Alex Efros schrieb: |
| 2 |
> Hi! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:53:05PM +0100, Christian Bricart wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Drawbacks: |
| 6 |
>> according to FHS /usr may be a remote filesystem, but /etc/localtime has |
| 7 |
>> to exist during boot. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Can anybody in _this_ maillist confirm importance of "remote /usr" support? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
quoting from http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEUSRHIERARCHY |
| 12 |
[..] |
| 13 |
/usr is the second major section of the filesystem. /usr is shareable, |
| 14 |
read-only data. That means that /usr should be shareable between various |
| 15 |
FHS-compliant hosts and must not be written to. Any information that is |
| 16 |
host-specific or varies with time is stored elsewhere. |
| 17 |
[..] |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Christian |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives