| 1 |
> Hi! |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Is it has sense to switch from glibc to dietlibc or uClibc or maybe other? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> How this can be done in Gentoo? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Is it possible to have system without glibc at all or I must have glibc |
| 8 |
> together with dietlibc (for example) and have some software compiled |
| 9 |
> with glibc and some with dietlibc? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
You can try out the uclibc embedded stages here |
| 12 |
<http://gentoo.osuosl.org/experimental/x86/embedded/stages/> |
| 13 |
works as a glibc replacement. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Dietlibc shared libraries are very much experimental too. But using it to |
| 16 |
compile static binaries is quite reliable in my experience. |
| 17 |
<http://fefe.de/dietlibc/> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> How using other *libc will affect server performance (this is most important |
| 20 |
> question here)? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
YMMV, using dietlibc and uClibc only makes sense with embedded setups |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Any problems because of not using glibc? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Is anybody has real server based on non-glibc? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Good luck :-) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
--ed |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives