1 |
Hi, |
2 |
mod_ssl is included in the 2.x distribution as far as i know. Therefore |
3 |
u dont need a seperate module for it. |
4 |
|
5 |
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/ |
6 |
|
7 |
Cheers |
8 |
alex |
9 |
|
10 |
Collin Starkweather wrote: |
11 |
(...) |
12 |
> |
13 |
> So far so good. Only Apache 2.0.x. However, now I want to add |
14 |
> mod_ssl. Even accepting unstable, I get both Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x |
15 |
> |
16 |
> www root # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -p mod_php \ |
17 |
> mod_perl mod_ssl |
18 |
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order: |
19 |
> Calculating dependencies ...done! |
20 |
> [ebuild N ] dev-util/yacc-1.9.1-r2 |
21 |
> [ebuild N ] net-www/apache-2.0.49-r1 |
22 |
> [ebuild N ] dev-php/mod_php-4.3.6-r1 |
23 |
> [ebuild N ] dev-perl/CGI-3.04 |
24 |
> [ebuild N ] dev-perl/mod_perl-1.99.11 |
25 |
> [ebuild N ] net-www/apache-1.3.29-r2 |
26 |
> [ebuild N ] net-www/mod_ssl-2.8.16 |
27 |
> www root # |
28 |
> |
29 |
> The mod_ssl homepage (http://www.modssl.org) seems to indicate that it's |
30 |
> only for Apache 1.3.x, but other postings such as |
31 |
> |
32 |
> http://lxr.webperf.org/source.cgi/modules/ssl/mod_ssl.h |
33 |
> http://www.mail-archive.com/modssl-users@××××××.org/msg16758.html |
34 |
> |
35 |
> seem to indicate that it runs with Apache 2.0.x. Can anyone give me the |
36 |
> scoop on what's up with Apache2 and mod_ssl? |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Thanks, |
39 |
> |
40 |
> -Collin |
41 |
> |