Re: [gentoo-server] Re: Dspam Users, Stand Up Please

[radu herinean]

I was also eager to try it but couldn't get it to work on my qmail-vpopmail 
configuration. if anyone has tips on installing it please do post a howto on 
the forums and point it out for me.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jose Gonzalez Gomez" <jgonzalez.openinput@×××××.com>
To: <gentoo-server@l.g.o>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Re: Dspam Users, Stand Up Please


> 2005/9/26, Thomas Kirchner <lists@××××××××.org>:
>> * On Sep 26 16:24, Ow Mun Heng (gentoo-server@l.g.o) wrote:
>> > Now, I'm wondering how to properly configure Dspam. Dspam seems to work
>> > well enough but I"m having trouble with dspam not properly
>> > tagging/recognising SPAM. SPAMassassin seems to do fine.
>>
>> I was really excited about trying DSPAM, but I had the same result as
>> you - it just couldn't tag spam.  I scoured the manuals and mailing
>> lists, learned all about the configuration system, but DSPAM just
>> couldn't be anywhere near as accurate as Spamassassin.  Spamassassin is a
>> bit slower to run, but it just simply does a better job.  I, too, liked
>> the CGI interface, but if it's an interface to a failing spam filter,
>> what's the point?
>
> As far as I know about DSPAM (anybody correct me if I'm wrong), you
> must train it in order to begin detecting spam. I have never
> configured it, but I'm using it, and it provides two special addresses
> per user: spam-user@××××××××××.com and fp-user@××××××××××.com.
> Whenever you receive spam not detected by DSPAM you must forward it to
> the first address. Whenever DSPAM incorrectly tags a mail as SPAM you
> must forward it to the second address (false positive). The more you
> train it, the more accurate it gets.
>
> HTH, best regards
> Jose
>
> --
> gentoo-server@g.o mailing list
>
>

-- 
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list