| 1 |
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:30:21 +0800 Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu@××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Philip Leonard wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> >On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:01:46 +0800 Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu@××××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> >>Philip Leonard wrote: |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >>>Just get a wildcard certificate for the domain. |
| 14 |
> >>> |
| 15 |
> >>> |
| 16 |
> >>> |
| 17 |
> >>> |
| 18 |
> >>Sorry? but I called entrust.com and they told me on the phone "one |
| 19 |
> >>certificate for one domain, no wildcard certificate". |
| 20 |
> >> |
| 21 |
> >>Do you know any issuer (that trusted by IE 5.5) could issue wildcard |
| 22 |
> >>certificate? |
| 23 |
> >> |
| 24 |
> >> |
| 25 |
> >> |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> >freessl.com has wildcard certs and they claim a very high percentage of browsers will accept them. |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> How wonderful. I just called up freessl.com the teller told me the |
| 31 |
> wildcard certificate is okay and their certificate is okay (no warning) |
| 32 |
> on IE 5.5! |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Just hope it is true. I'll request a test certificate to check for sure. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I know their "normal" certs work okay because I have a couple of them. I do no have a wildcard one though so I can say for sure. |
Archives