| 1 |
KVM is enabled in BIOS too. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I doubled checked it. Disabled and even got a message saying the KVM is not available when Disabled in BIOS…. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Thanks, |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Vinícius Ferrão: Administrador de Sistemas |
| 8 |
www.ferrao.eti.br | +55 (21) 8888-2619 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Apr 18, 2013, at 11:29 AM, Robert Bridge <robert@××××××××.com> |
| 11 |
wrote: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Hi, |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Are you sure your hardware virt isn't disabled in the BIOS? It is, in |
| 16 |
> my experience, the one BIOS setting the linux kernel doesn't/can't |
| 17 |
> over-ride. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Cheers, |
| 20 |
> RobbieAB |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> On 18 April 2013 01:35, Vinícius Ferrão <viniciusferrao@×××××××.br> wrote: |
| 23 |
>> Hello dudes, |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> Thanks for the replies. |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> But I've read somewhere that -no-kvm should be enabled in order to run NT4 |
| 28 |
>> Properly. |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> Anyway, I removed the flag and nothing really happened. It's still slow. |
| 31 |
>> It's usable, but slow. VMWare was much faster. |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> And about the RAM issue. It's Windows NT4. I don't think more is necessary. |
| 34 |
>> The machine boots consuming only 30MB. And about the slowness of the system |
| 35 |
>> is during CPU intensive operations. |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> Anything else to try dudes? |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> Thanks, |
| 40 |
>> |
| 41 |
>> Vinícius Ferrão: Administrador de Sistemas |
| 42 |
>> www.ferrao.eti.br | +55 (21) 8888-2619 |
| 43 |
>> |
| 44 |
>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen |
| 45 |
>> <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de> |
| 46 |
>> wrote: |
| 47 |
>> |
| 48 |
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 07:34:00PM +0000, Vinícius Ferrão wrote: |
| 49 |
>> |
| 50 |
>> Hello dudes, |
| 51 |
>> |
| 52 |
>> I'm running Windows NT 4 Terminal Server on QEMU and the performance is too |
| 53 |
>> slow; I don't even know how to debug it and I even don't if this is normal |
| 54 |
>> or not. |
| 55 |
>> |
| 56 |
>> On VMWare Player the performance was much better. And this isn't a |
| 57 |
>> migration. I've reinstalled the NT4 from the ground. |
| 58 |
>> |
| 59 |
>> Anyway; i'm launching the VM with this arguments: |
| 60 |
>> kvm -m 128m -name WinNT4TS -drive file=winnt4ts.raw -cdrom Windows\ NT\ 4\ |
| 61 |
>> Terminal\ Server\ Image/WINNT-TSE40.iso -net |
| 62 |
>> nic,model=ne2k_pci,macaddr=00:0c:29:74:fa:b4 -net tap -vga std -cpu |
| 63 |
>> pentium,level=1 -smp 1 -no-acpi -no-hpet -no-kvm -boot c -vnc none |
| 64 |
>> -daemonize |
| 65 |
>> |
| 66 |
>> |
| 67 |
>> Hi, |
| 68 |
>> |
| 69 |
>> iirc the commandline switch --no-kvm disables kvm (so it'S just software |
| 70 |
>> emulated qemu). You disable hardware virtualization accerleration with |
| 71 |
>> it. |
| 72 |
>> |
| 73 |
>> Other than that: more than 128 MB ram will most likely also help to |
| 74 |
>> speed things up. |
| 75 |
>> |
| 76 |
>> WKR |
| 77 |
>> Hinnerk |
| 78 |
>> |
| 79 |
>> |
| 80 |
> |
Archives