| 1 |
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:06 -0500, Charles Duffy wrote: |
| 2 |
> Wendall Cada wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I very much agree with his assessment here. This is what I do for binary |
| 4 |
> > distribution to desktop systems. It is very effective. I have played |
| 5 |
> > with Catalyst quite a bit, but agree that catalyst-2 is much more well |
| 6 |
> > suited for this. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'm sorry; which "this" are you referring to? I'm a little unclear on |
| 9 |
> whether what you're indicating that you use is Ramon's suggestion (of |
| 10 |
> using catalyst-2) or our senior sysadmin's suggestion (of using emerge, |
| 11 |
> set to output binary packages and target a chroot). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I use (of using emerge, set to output binary packages and target a |
| 14 |
chroot) right now, as Ramon's senior sysadmin recommends. But am looking |
| 15 |
into using catalyst-2 in the future. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Wendall |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Thank you! |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff |
| 23 |
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;) |
| 24 |
-- Linus Torvalds |
Archives