| 1 |
Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ben Munat wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Just out of curiosity (I've *always* used apache 2 on gentoo), why is |
| 4 |
>> apache 1.x being removed from portage? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Probably because of the extra time/work that it takes to maintain |
| 7 |
> compatability/support for both 1.x and 2.x in every ebuild that uses |
| 8 |
> apache. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
Hmm, yeah... and every little security patch or upstream hiccup... I |
| 11 |
guess that was a dumb question... plenty of extra work there. Well, I |
| 12 |
for one, would love to see the whole 1.* vs. 2.* thing behind us. Now |
| 13 |
can anyone kick some sense into Apple? :-) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
b |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives