1 |
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 10:22 am, Dan Noe wrote: |
2 |
> > > Even for local users, if you are running courier-imap, it's nice to |
3 |
> > > have local accounts connect to the IMAP server rather than the .maildir |
4 |
> > > or mailbox files, because this greatly reduces the probability of |
5 |
> > > locking related hastles. |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > I used to use mutt directly on a server that had courier-imap running, |
8 |
> > > and when Mozilla Thunderbird on my other workstation machine recieved |
9 |
> > > mail it reorganized based on filters, causing mutt to freak out that |
10 |
> > > the mailbox was being modified externally. Using mutt in imap mode |
11 |
> > > made it much more tolerant. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > doesn't this just duplicate all of your emails though? doesn't mutt |
14 |
> > download the messages and store them locally somewhere? I'm prety sure |
15 |
> > kmail and evolution and any other imap client do :) |
16 |
> |
17 |
> POP stores messages locally. IMAP has the capability to store all messages |
18 |
> on the server, and most clients do this. This is one of the biggest |
19 |
> advantages of IMAP. |
20 |
|
21 |
yes, I know.. I use imap for all of my email. most imap clients, however, |
22 |
keep a cache of the emails/headers they have downloaded from the server. I |
23 |
would not be surprised if mutt also did this. |
24 |
|
25 |
> Myself, I use mutt locally on my server and I also use Evolution at work |
26 |
> and occaisionally MozillaThunderbird at home when I need to muck around |
27 |
> with lots of attachments. I store all my mail, send and received, in a |
28 |
> single, searchable mailbox. |
29 |
|
30 |
yes, I as well. Being able to be anywhere and access my entire mailbox is |
31 |
extremely handy :) |
32 |
|
33 |
-Jeremy |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. |
37 |
jeremy@××××××.com ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 847.492.0470 int'l |
38 |
kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail |