1 |
hi Sébastien, |
2 |
|
3 |
gentoo is a great system for server use. |
4 |
performance - depends on how much time you have, kernel 2.6 (due this month) |
5 |
may be of interest for you. looks quite promising, also on multi processor |
6 |
systems: http://developer.osdl.org/craiger/hackbench/ |
7 |
|
8 |
this test does measures on process scheduling. |
9 |
|
10 |
kind regards, |
11 |
tom |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
http://www.wahuu.at - die zukunft ist jetzt! |
15 |
http://borg.wahuu.at - new it generation |
16 |
|
17 |
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 16:46, Sebastien Arnaud wrote: |
18 |
> Hi, |
19 |
> |
20 |
> After using gentoo for almost a year now on 4 different desktop |
21 |
> systems, I decided to give it a shot as a server. A company I perform |
22 |
> some work for as like 6 old DELL 6350s quad Xeon systems that are about |
23 |
> to be taken out of their Windows production environment so I decided to |
24 |
> try to demonstrate that switching to a linux platform (Gentoo of course |
25 |
> ;) could squeeze a little bit more performance and stability out of |
26 |
> those and hopefully avoid a costly upgrade for a year or two. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Gentoo is currently running on one of those 6350 and I haven't' had too |
29 |
> much trouble setting up (apart from the lack of scsi raid support of |
30 |
> the smp kernel on the 1.4 livecd). Anyway, I would like to know what |
31 |
> type of tools any of you might have used to benchmark/stress test |
32 |
> properly your Gentoo servers. The goal being to try to optimize as much |
33 |
> as possible performance while monitoring stability of the system under |
34 |
> high level of stress. |
35 |
> Also, if anybody went already through all this process which kernel |
36 |
> will performance best on a multi processor system? |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Thank you in advance ! |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Sébastien Arnaud |
41 |
> sebastien@××××××××××××××××××.com |
42 |
> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> X-UIDL: j%c!!':l!!;>4!!i<5"! |