Archives
Archives
| From: | deadhead <deadhead@×××××.it> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-server] Advice on Gentoo Servers | ||
| Date: | Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:33:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 443B779D.4060807@wooow.it | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-server] Advice on Gentoo Servers by "Daniel Schledermann (TypoConsult A/S)" |
||
| 1 | Daniel Schledermann (TypoConsult A/S) wrote: |
| 2 | > Another alternative is Arch Linux, which also has binary packages, but |
| 3 | > also a portage-like build system. This IS linux, but uses BSD-init, |
| 4 | > and does not seem as mature as Gentoo or FreeBSD. |
| 5 | Another reason why I'll never use arch on a server is the lack of a |
| 6 | Security Team and the fact that a lot of packages aren't present for |
| 7 | their distro. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | cheers |
| 10 | |
| 11 | deadhead |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |