1 |
I suspect that it would be out of your price range, but I do want to say |
2 |
that legato networker does work under gentoo, even if it isn't r*d-h*t. |
3 |
Just a data point to add to the mix. |
4 |
|
5 |
Andy |
6 |
|
7 |
--On Monday, March 22, 2004 09:41:09 -0800 Bryn Hughes <linux@×××××××.ca> |
8 |
wrote: |
9 |
|
10 |
> Hi all, |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I'm wondering what everyone is using to back up their Gentoo servers. |
13 |
> Right now I'm using Amanda which works fairly well but I'm thinking about |
14 |
> changing over to something new. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> My environment: |
17 |
> - 2 servers, about 120 gigs total disk space between them |
18 |
> - a 75G (native) DLT tape library (Quantum 4500 with 15G tapes) |
19 |
> |
20 |
> What I like about amanda: |
21 |
> - network backup, one server controls everything |
22 |
> - point-in-time restore (I can choose to restore a file from last week |
23 |
> and it will tell me what tape it needs) |
24 |
> - decently reliable after initial setup |
25 |
> - intelligent planning of incremental backups automatically |
26 |
> |
27 |
> What I don't like about amanda: |
28 |
> - can't append to the previous day's tape (lots of tapes that only get |
29 |
> 15% full or so with incrementals) |
30 |
> - large dumps cannot span multiple tapes |
31 |
> - handling of above results in amanda spending hours writing to a tape |
32 |
> just to start all over again on the next tape when it runs out of space |
33 |
> - no GUI |
34 |
> |
35 |
> I want to find something that uses my tapes more effectively and wastes |
36 |
> less time than amanda. What I don't want to loose is the indexing |
37 |
> functions and the ability to backup both my servers (and as many more as |
38 |
> I add in the future) without having to actually mount the partitions to |
39 |
> be backed up to the backup server. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Anyone have any thoughts? I've been poking around and I've found BURT |
42 |
> but that doesn't seem to have any activity since 1999 or so. Bacula |
43 |
> looks promising also (in fact right now it seems to be the closest to |
44 |
> what I'm looking for). Anyone have any experience? |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Bryn |
47 |
> |