| 1 |
It may be heresy, but I have gs-sources on a cluster of Dell 2650s here and |
| 2 |
it has been solid for our use. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Andy |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:29:48 -0400 "Rev. Jeffrey Paul" <sneak@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
RJP> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:14:43PM -0400, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 10 |
RJP> > Personally, I avoid gentoo-sources for server usage. I don't feel |
| 11 |
RJP> it has |
| 12 |
RJP> > received enough attention of late to warrant production usage. |
| 13 |
RJP> There have |
| 14 |
RJP> > been numerous reports of problems with it on IRC, including |
| 15 |
RJP> choppiness, |
| 16 |
RJP> > slowness and instability. ymmv and all that. |
| 17 |
RJP> |
| 18 |
RJP> I've encountered random odd freezes using gentoo-sources as well. |
| 19 |
RJP> What do |
| 20 |
RJP> you usually use on production machines? When stability is key, I've |
| 21 |
RJP> found |
| 22 |
RJP> myself using vanilla-sources and then manually patching grsec in, |
| 23 |
RJP> although |
| 24 |
RJP> I admit I am not as informed about the other kernel source sets as |
| 25 |
RJP> I'd |
| 26 |
RJP> like to be. Are there better alternatives for production servers? |
| 27 |
RJP> |
| 28 |
RJP> -j |
| 29 |
RJP> |
Archives