1 |
OK... it looks like this is just fiber channel... do you have a fiber switch |
2 |
or are you using direct connects? |
3 |
|
4 |
In gentoo you will use a qlogic card and just boot the box... the luns that |
5 |
are presented to the server will just show up as raw disk. If you want to |
6 |
get sexy with it, you multipath to set up dual channels to the same disk and |
7 |
round robin your access to those disks. This will require a bit more |
8 |
knowlege of the XRaid and how it presents storage, but it should be |
9 |
possible. |
10 |
|
11 |
If you are using a fiber switch you will want to create a zone from the |
12 |
device to the nodes based on the wwn that you get off the qlogic interface |
13 |
which should look something like this: |
14 |
|
15 |
$ cat /proc/scsi/qla2xxx/0 |
16 |
... |
17 |
SCSI Device Information: |
18 |
scsi-qla1-adapter-node=200100e08ba84706; |
19 |
scsi-qla1-adapter-port=210100e08ba84706; |
20 |
scsi-qla1-target-0=50060482d52cead8; |
21 |
... |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
On 25-Jan-2007, Brian Kroth wrote: |
27 |
> We actually have an XRaid now sitting in a box. I was simply going to |
28 |
> purchase some fiber channel cards for the servers so they can attach to |
29 |
> it via a QLogic fiber channel switch we have. But once that's happened |
30 |
> I want to make sure I can share the same storage pool with all, or |
31 |
> perhaps just a subset, of the servers. With OSX this required a special |
32 |
> XSan client. I have done very limited research so far to see what it |
33 |
> would take to get a collection of Gentoo servers to do this, but figured |
34 |
> I should ask and see if anyone could point me in some directions. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Brian |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Sean Cook wrote: |
39 |
> >I would actually spend a little more and start looking at iSCSI for |
40 |
> >attached |
41 |
> >storage. You can generally pickup some decent chassis on ebay for not a |
42 |
> >lot |
43 |
> >of change and it gives you a lot more flexibility. |
44 |
> > |
45 |
> >GFS is ok if you don't want to mess around with a SAN but it has no where |
46 |
> >near the performance of fiber or iSCSI attached storage. |
47 |
> > |
48 |
> >Here is exactly what I am talking about... |
49 |
> >http://cgi.ebay.com/Dell-EMC-AX100i-iSCSI-12-Slot-SAN-Array-w-4x-250GB-HDD_W0QQitemZ300072200442QQihZ020QQcategoryZ111458QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > |
52 |
> >On 25-Jan-2007, Brian Kroth wrote: |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> >>Hello all, |
55 |
> >> |
56 |
> >>I currently manage about 40 Window, OSX, and Hardened Gentoo servers. I |
57 |
> >>will soon have 12 P4 servers that were previously used as video encoders |
58 |
> >>free as well as an Apple XRaid. With all this spare hardware I thought |
59 |
> >>I'd research setting up a cluster of servers running Apache for load |
60 |
> >>balancing and high availability. I'm also looking into a MySQL cluster, |
61 |
> >>but that wouldn't require a shared filesystem. I'm wondering if anyone |
62 |
> >>has done something like this before and in particular knows a good |
63 |
> >>filesystem to use so that each of the servers can access and potentially |
64 |
> >>write to the same storage array. I've accomplished the same thing with |
65 |
> >>XServes running OSX, but they like to charge you a pretty penny for the |
66 |
> >>XSan software that allows this which I thought I'd try to avoid if |
67 |
> >>possible. So far I've seen only GFS, but haven't gotten much reading |
68 |
> >>done on it yet. Any other tips or insights would be appreciated as well. |
69 |
> >> |
70 |
> >>Thanks, |
71 |
> >>Brian |
72 |
> >>-- |
73 |
> >>gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
74 |
> >> |
75 |
> >> |
76 |
> |
77 |
> -- |
78 |
> gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
79 |
> |
80 |
-- |
81 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |