| 1 |
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:52:02PM +1100 or thereabouts, Andrew Cowie wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 11:40, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 3 |
> > * All ebuilds in this 'frozen tree' are guaranteed to be available for a |
| 4 |
> > certain period of time so admins can plan their upgrades more accurately. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Tell me again why such ebuilds can't be maintained in existing portage - |
| 7 |
> all we have to do is *not* remove them from the tree so fast, no? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Nobody said it had to be a separate tree. That's an implementation detail. |
| 10 |
I'm using the term 'frozen tree' more as an easy way of describing a state, |
| 11 |
rather than an implementation. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
--kurt |
Archives