Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Joost Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Re: Xen Dom0 using kernel 3.0
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:54:46
Message-Id: 3506609.LxEt7Z0A4y@eve
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] Re: Xen Dom0 using kernel 3.0 by Pandu Poluan
1 On Monday, August 15, 2011 08:30:04 PM Pandu Poluan wrote:
2 > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 19:47, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote:
3 > > On Mon, August 15, 2011 2:22 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
4 > >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:08, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote:
5 > >>> On Mon, August 15, 2011 8:18 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
6 > >>>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:29, Joost Roeleveld
7 > >>>>>> That is, how to provide sensible defaults yet not irreversibly
8 > >>>>>> removing Gentoo's freedom. So, GeDZux will be a Gentoo
9 > >>>>>> variant, a
10 > >>>>>> 'submetadistro', if you will :P
11 > >>>>>
12 > >>>>> A profile putting all the necessary tools (xen, kernel,
13 > >>>>> bridge,....)
14 > >>>>> as
15 > >>>>> required.
16 > >>>>
17 > >>>> Aha! Good idea. Let me learn how to make a profile then.
18 > >>>
19 > >>> That way we can also set default USE-flags suitable for when using
20 > >>> Xen.
21 > >>
22 > >> Gotcha :-)
23 > >>
24 > >> I'm going to try out on my company's VMware boxes (the guys at
25 > >> xen-users said that Xen runs okay on VMware, albeit without HVM domU
26 > >> support).
27 > >
28 > > I think starting with a list of packages and use-flags needed to get PV
29 > > and HVM domains running would be a good starting point.
30 > > Then, we can put that into a profile and create a stage4 tar-file with
31 > > current versions.
32 >
33 > I assume those are packages and use-flags on the dom0? I agree.
34 >
35 > Anyways, good news: I may soon land my grubby hands on an unused IBM
36 > Server. It's a new-ish one, AFAICT, so it should support VT-x.
37 >
38 > We can thus test HVM domU's, yay!
39
40 I've got 2 machines that can run HVM.
41 I am planning on setting one of these up for dual boot into xen for testing
42 purposes already.
43 The other is already running Xen, but not done any HVM on there yet.
44
45 > > I think it would be a good idea to try to continue on this with the
46 > > maintainers for Xen on Gentoo?
47 >
48 > Aren't they on this list, too?
49
50 I don't know. If this were gentoo-user, then i'd assume so.