Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-server] Re: Re: Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 05:20:57
Message-Id: bk3tg1xfeh.ln2@spinner.my.domain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] Re: Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree by Ruben Vandille
1 Ruben Vandille wrote:
2
3 > On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 04:46, Jerry McBride wrote:
4 >> > There are some plusses to having the database backend: Centralized
5 >> > tree, and fast queries. Downside: Extra complexity, and how often do
6 >> > you need to query the tree anyway?
7 >> >
8 >>
9 >> I like Linux and I love Gentoo's wide selection of applications. I'm
10 >> constantly poking around the portage tree... :')
11 >
12 > emerge esearch
13 > and run "eupdatedb" after you've synced
14 >
15 > It's not THE solution, but I like/use it verry much
16 >
17 > R.
18
19 Yes, an excellent search engine. The only hitch is updating the database...
20 but then again, if cron is doing the work when I'm asleep... who cares. :')
21
22 Cheers.
23
24
25 --
26
27 ******************************************************************************
28 Registered Linux User Number 185956
29 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
30 Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net
31 This email account no longers accepts attachments or messages containing
32 html.
33 6:55pm up 9 days, 7:29, 3 users, load average: 0.09, 0.11, 0.09

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] Re: Re: Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree Ashley McKenzie <ash@×××××××××××××.net>