1 |
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 00:20:16 +0100, Simon Striker <simon@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Hi! |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I have just installed Gentoo on my laptop and I am very satisfied with |
5 |
> it! I really like the portage feature and other Gentoo philosophy. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> At home and at "week-end house" I have a Linux server with Slackware |
8 |
> distribution installed. Now I am thinking of reinstalling my servers and |
9 |
> installing the Gentoo Linux on them, but I am a bit worried |
10 |
> because all packages in Portage tree are NOT up-to-date. |
11 |
> |
12 |
<flame> Hum ever tried Debian potato ? </flame>. Seriously what do you |
13 |
mean by all packages ? Do you run stable or unstable ? If you talk |
14 |
about some obscure package yeah probably but everything is mostly up |
15 |
to date. If you really want leading edge or even bleeding edge run |
16 |
unstable (put your arch here). Browse bugs.gentoo.org or even there |
17 |
are some cvs ebuilds that you can find. Why not unmask some ebuilds |
18 |
that are masked from /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask too. Try to be |
19 |
more precise about what you find "NOT to up to date" like example |
20 |
perhaps. |
21 |
|
22 |
etcat -v php |
23 |
[ Results for search key : php ] |
24 |
[ Candidate applications found : 8 ] |
25 |
|
26 |
Only printing found installed programs. |
27 |
|
28 |
* dev-php/php : |
29 |
[ ] 4.3.8 (0) |
30 |
[ ~ ] 4.3.9_rc1 (0) |
31 |
[ ] 4.3.9 (0) |
32 |
[M ] 5.0.0 (0) |
33 |
[ ~ ] 5.0.0-r1 (0) |
34 |
[ ~ ] 5.0.1 (0) |
35 |
[ ~ ] 5.0.2 (0) |
36 |
[ I] 5.0.2-r1 (0) |
37 |
|
38 |
See portage has an ebuild for php 5.0.2 but it is masked unstable. If |
39 |
you run only stable package you will only be able to use 4.3.9. Do you |
40 |
understand better how portage works ? |
41 |
|
42 |
> I am using servers for: Mail-server, web-server, printer-share, |
43 |
> firewall, router, backup-server, webmail, mysql etc. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> I would like to know, how do you maintain your servers? |
46 |
|
47 |
emerge sync |
48 |
emerge -uDav world |
49 |
emerge -a depclean |
50 |
revdep-rebuild |
51 |
|
52 |
That's one way to do it and aimed toward a workstation. As for |
53 |
production servers I run stable, at most update once per week and |
54 |
mostly security updates but I don't think I need to go there. As for |
55 |
my servers at home well there are happy running unstable with 2.6 |
56 |
kernel, gcc 3.4 latest glibc nptl enabled (everything with the kitchen |
57 |
sink) . It's mostly for testing ground and toying. |
58 |
|
59 |
> Is it safe to |
60 |
> have Gantoo as a server? |
61 |
> |
62 |
Yes depending what you do with it and who's administering it. The |
63 |
default settings are actually better than most distro that I have |
64 |
tried but like everything there is work to do. |
65 |
|
66 |
> What do you think of putting all installed packages into |
67 |
> /etc/portage/packages.keywords (~x86) for server? |
68 |
> |
69 |
Depends on your needs. Normally no for production server but if the |
70 |
need is there, nobody is stopping you from testing it first to see how |
71 |
it goes. They are a lot of metrics to consider that you haven't |
72 |
prodided and should be considered. |
73 |
|
74 |
> I would like to make my Linux server "insensitive" for hackers or |
75 |
> intruders. Is it possible with Gentoo? |
76 |
> |
77 |
Gentoo linux is still linux. What [put distro here] can do, gentoo |
78 |
linux can too. Anyway, I could tell you a resounding yes but it's a |
79 |
too vague question to develop on the subject. |
80 |
|
81 |
> I will be very gratefull to hear some of your opinion or exepriences. |
82 |
> |
83 |
> Thanks in advance! |
84 |
> |
85 |
> Best regards, Simon |
86 |
> ------------- |
87 |
> |
88 |
> Simon Striker |
89 |
> Rusjanov trg 2 |
90 |
> 1000 Ljubljana +38641473856 |
91 |
> Europe (Slovenia) |
92 |
> |
93 |
> E-mail: simon@×××××××××.net |
94 |
> |
95 |
> |