1 |
On Fri, 18 May 2007, widyachacra wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> how to tell qmail to put all its outgoing mails through this port or ip? |
4 |
|
5 |
Couldn't you use smtproutes to do this (i.e. /var/qmail/smtproutes) ? |
6 |
|
7 |
man qmail-remote |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
> |
11 |
> On 5/17/07, Xavier Neys <neysx@g.o> wrote: |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > rdmurray@××××××××.com wrote: |
14 |
> > > On Thu, 17 May 2007 at 14:42, Xavier Neys wrote: |
15 |
> > >> rdmurray@××××××××.com wrote: |
16 |
> > >>> On Thu, 17 May 2007 at 13:13, Matthias Bethke wrote: |
17 |
> > >>>> the cleanest solution but it should work for now---there's certainly |
18 |
> > a |
19 |
> > >>>> better one if you know qmail well, which I don't. |
20 |
> > >>> |
21 |
> > >>> I doubt that. This is a purely ip level routing |
22 |
> > >>> issue, not something that can be handled at |
23 |
> > >>> the application level unless you are using a smart |
24 |
> > >>> host. |
25 |
> > >>> |
26 |
> > >>> iptables is what the OP needs. |
27 |
> > >> |
28 |
> > >> Not necessarily. If you use your ISP as a smarthost, then you just |
29 |
> > >> define a |
30 |
> > >> route to it via the right interface. |
31 |
> > > |
32 |
> > > I believe I said that: "unless you are using a smarthost". :) |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > Sorry about that. |
35 |
> > I saw two levels, i.e. "iptables is what the OP needs." as a reply to your |
36 |
> > reply. |
37 |
> > My mistake :) |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > Cheers, |
41 |
> > -- |
42 |
> > / Xavier Neys |
43 |
> > \_ Gentoo Documentation Project |
44 |
> > / |
45 |
> > /\ http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> > |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> |
50 |
> |
51 |
> |
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
A |
55 |
-- |
56 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |