1 |
Am Mittwoch 15 Februar 2006 02:36 schrieb Kerin Millar: |
2 |
> On 15/02/06, Kerin Millar <kerframil@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> <snip> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > then they'll break. This library is provided by *either* gcc-3.3 (and |
7 |
> > lower) OR the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 package. That's why the HOWTO |
8 |
> > tells you to install libstdc++-v3 early. It makes the following kind |
9 |
> > of operation safe for example: |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > # emerge libstdc++-v3 && emerge -C =gcc-3.3* |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I'd just like to say here that you can opt not to install libstdc++-v3 |
14 |
> and just keep a copy of gcc-3.3 if you want. I do because I sometimes |
15 |
> need to compare the two versions when looking at certain packages with |
16 |
> a view to SSP (-fstack-protector) compatibility. On the other hand, I |
17 |
> spoke to one guy very recently who could not get one or two gnome |
18 |
> packages on his desktop system to link to libstdc++.so.6 when |
19 |
> upgrading although he swore that he had gcc-3.4.4 selected as the |
20 |
> active compiler and everything seemed to check out. So I just told him |
21 |
> to ensure that he was covered by libstdc++-v3 and remove gcc-3.3 then, |
22 |
> lo and behold, the two packages built as expected thereafter. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Therefore I would suggest following due procedure here and then |
25 |
> building gcc-3.3 again *after* if you want to keep it around for some |
26 |
> reason ;) |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Cheers, |
29 |
> |
30 |
> --Kerin |
31 |
|
32 |
Kerin, |
33 |
|
34 |
thank you for your very detailed answer. I will definitely consider it, |
35 |
when I do the upgrade. But I think the other aspect of the problem (see |
36 |
my other post in this thread) is more important for gentoo users. I am |
37 |
still interested in any problem reports though. |
38 |
|
39 |
Thanks and regards, |
40 |
Timo |
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |