1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
Zhang Weiwu wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Hello. I googled around with no luck. I wish there could be some very |
6 |
> easy explanation of cipher strengths so that I could answer questions |
7 |
> like 'how strong 3DES is' to novice users. Most results I could find are |
8 |
> too technical / mathematical. I want very simple explanation like this: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> 128 bit IDEA is very strong cipher. Normally, take a piece of encrypted |
11 |
> data, it would need one Pentium Xeon 2GHz personal computer xxxx years |
12 |
> to decrypt the data, this is as long as the age of the earth (or human, |
13 |
> or USA, whatever). Even if you could use the most powerful computer now |
14 |
> one the earth abcde (replace abcde with the computation power), you need |
15 |
> xxx (a number) of them to decrypt it in 5 years. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
Take a look at distributed.net site. |
19 |
They host competitions in key-breaking using a distributed client. |
20 |
|
21 |
Among one of them is the des3 standard. That might give you the |
22 |
indication you're looking for ? |
23 |
And maybe some more pointers on where to look for this kind of info. |
24 |
|
25 |
<Quote from their website> |
26 |
On December 12, 1998 RSA officially announced that they would sponsor |
27 |
the DES-III contest, which would start January 18, 1999 at 9am PST. To |
28 |
meet this challenge, distributed.net again planned on using the idle |
29 |
processing time of computers all over the world to test the at most 256 |
30 |
keys to determine the correct one. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
Additionally, RSA placed strict time limits on the challenge. |
34 |
|
35 |
up to 24 hours to win $10,000 |
36 |
up to 48 hours to win $5,000 |
37 |
up to 56 hours to win $1,000 |
38 |
more than 56 hours - nothing |
39 |
|
40 |
Accomplishing this great computational task required thousands of |
41 |
people around the Internet to help out by running a special client |
42 |
program on their computers, allowing it to connect to one of our |
43 |
coordinating servers. When the client program ran, computers were |
44 |
assigned a block of work to test and determine if a solution was found. |
45 |
With this system, the more computers we had working together, the faster |
46 |
the combined effort would be. Any machine with a reliable connection to |
47 |
the Internet was usable for our purposes. |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
To make things even more interesting, distributed.net worked to allow |
51 |
the EFF hardware Deep Crack to participate cooperatively within the |
52 |
distributed.net effort. This enabled it to join its computational power |
53 |
with the thousands of deployed distributed.net clients that were |
54 |
participating via the Internet. Despite the immense power of the EFF |
55 |
Deep Crack, distributed.net's thousands of deployed clients still |
56 |
surpassed the EFF hardware by more than a factor of 2 in speed. |
57 |
|
58 |
|
59 |
As it turned out, distributed.net was entirely successful in this |
60 |
endeavor, and DES-III ended with success on January 19, 1999 at 7am PST, |
61 |
yielding a solution in less than 24 hours! |
62 |
</Quote> |
63 |
|
64 |
Grtz, |
65 |
|
66 |
Ramon |