Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-server
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-server: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-server@g.o
From: Haim Ashkenazi <haim@...>
Subject: Re: advanced routing question
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:17:31 +0300
On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 06:39 -0400, Bill Roberts wrote:
> On 11:37 Sun 24 Apr     , Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > I just came across this article:
> > http://enterprise.linux.com/article.pl?sid=05/04/10/2132252&from=rss
> > 
> > It seems that I was doing things the hard way (using iproute with
> > metrics). the one thing I don't understand is how to prefer one route
> > over the other (e.g. when one connection is faster).
> 
> Haim
> 
> Interesting article.
> 
> Maybe the order of the routes in the routing table controls? You could
> experiment by reversing the order of the two add default gateway
> commands.
I'll try this one :)

> 
> Another possibility would the the eth number, i.e., eth0 is primary,
> eth1 is secondary. You could control this by switching cables (and
> appropriate ip's) or by controlling the name assigned to each (see
> other recent thread in this mail list).
> 
> Bill Roberts
-- 
Haim
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
References:
advanced routing question
-- Haim Ashkenazi
Re: advanced routing question
-- Bill Roberts
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-server: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: advanced routing question
Next by thread:
Re: advanced routing question
Previous by date:
Re: advanced routing question
Next by date:
Server lockups (still ping) (OT because not Gentoo-specific?)


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-server mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.