Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@×××××××.li>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Configuration managment system
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:59:44
Message-Id: 201bac3a0903260859w132184cdk677c46a3a7664aa4@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] Configuration managment system by Caleb Cushing
1 >>> A they should have their own repo,
2 >>> B, they should be in the same branch.
3 >>
4 >> They should be in different repositories but in the same branch? That
5 >> ain't gonna work :-) What do you mean by this?
6
7 That's how I understand you.
8
9 +----------+ +----------+
10 | Repo A | | Repo B |
11 | | | |
12 | +-------------------+ |
13 | | The Branch | |
14 | | | |
15 | | file A | | file B | |
16 | | | | | |
17 | +--------|-|--------+ |
18 | | | |
19 +----------+ +----------+
20
21 File A is in Repo A but not Repo B.
22 File B is in Repo B but not Repo A.
23 File A and File B are in the Branch.
24 The Branch is in Repo A and Repo B.
25
26 That is obviously not what you mean but how I understand it. So please
27 tell me, in a bit more detail.
28
29 > these are mutually exclusive. you are confusing yourself by thinking
30 > both are possible at the same time.
31
32 You are confusing me :-)
33
34 -- Jonas

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-soc] Configuration managment system Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@×××××.com>