Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Rafael Martins <rafael@×××××××××××××××××.br>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Distfile patching support - Weekly report #9
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:48:54
Message-Id: CAHgY3qcyCuHYOrsK07yMVOo4C85HkkoEPKS=r6knDBuGxdMtwA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] Distfile patching support - Weekly report #9 by Rafael Martins
1 On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Rafael Martins
2 <rafael@×××××××××××××××××.br> wrote:
3 > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
4 >> On 18:09 Fri 29 Jul     , Rafael Martins wrote:
5 >>> I'm also writing a helper tool, called distpatchq, inspired by
6 >>> portageq, that will provide info about the deltas and distfiles to the
7 >>> package managers willing to implement distfile patching support.
8 >>
9 >> Wouldn't package managers prefer an API rather than a helper tool?
10 >>
11 >
12 > Yes. Actually the Python API of the tools is usable by package
13 > managers, but this won't work for paludis, I guess. I'm just
14 > implementing Portage support for now, though.
15 >
16 > On the other hand, I want to be able to change the internal API, if
17 > needed. In this case, I need a helper tool or a stable public API will
18 > be required. I picked the first to make the things easy for all the
19 > package managers.
20 >
21 > Best regards,
22 >
23 > --
24 > Rafael Goncalves Martins
25 > http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/
26 >
27
28 s/will be required//
29
30 --
31 Rafael Goncalves Martins
32 http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/