1 |
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:11:59 +0200 |
2 |
mmacleod@××××××××××.za wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > Here you have a central server and stuff. Before somebody told me he |
5 |
> > wants to create the following: A p2p network where all the data is |
6 |
> > stored in the network (on different peers) and not on a central |
7 |
> > server. There you get a really distributed system with lots and |
8 |
> > lots of things to think about and lots and lots of problems to |
9 |
> > address. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> You are completely misunderstanding and incorrectly stating what I |
12 |
> said by the way. |
13 |
> I clearly stated in my thread that there would be a central server |
14 |
> controlling the network, this server would obviously be used for |
15 |
> things like hashes as well. |
16 |
> To have the entire thing completely distributed with no central |
17 |
> control would be absolutely stupid. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> If you want people to look at what "somebody" told you please point |
20 |
> them to the original thread on the mailing list to interpret it for |
21 |
> themselves instead of telling them stuff which is not true, thanks. |
22 |
|
23 |
Sorry, I meant to sum the differences up and had forgotten that fact. |
24 |
You said "There obviously might be security concerns for users of such |
25 |
a system, this can be mitigated by using a central controlling server |
26 |
and by taking Hash signatures of compiled packages from users other |
27 |
then the original contributer." which mentions a central server. |
28 |
|
29 |
But what exactly would it do? Store hashes? Calculate hashes? Store |
30 |
metadata? Where does it get that from? |
31 |
|
32 |
So if I understand it right, for building packages you use some |
33 |
client-server system and for distributing them you have a central |
34 |
server to get information from and download packages using the p2p |
35 |
network? |
36 |
|
37 |
Philipp |